Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (October 29, 2025)
Back in the 1930s, Jean Harlow became a major star via “bad girl” roles. For another of these, we go to 1932’s The Beast of the City.
Police Captain Jim Fitzpatrick (Walter Huston) doesn’t shy away from violent means to battle crime. This gets him demoted until the public demands more forceful methods against rising gangster influence.
In the battle against mob boss Sam Belmonte (Jean Herscholt), Jim’s detective brother Ed (Wallace Ford) becomes romantically involved with “gang moll” Daisy Stevens (Harlow). This allows Ed to go undercover as part of the operation to negate Belmonte’s operation.
Perhaps it becomes a mistake to try to understand the tastes of an era that existed nearly a century ago. That said, I admit I find it perplexing that Harlow became such a sex symbol because I don’t think she was an especially attractive woman.
Of course, success as a movie star doesn’t rely solely on physical attributes. As seen here, Harlow creates a sassy and masochistic bad girl.
I guess that was enough for movie audiences of the 1930s, as I can’t find much sizzle in Harlow otherwise. Indeed, she delivers arguably the least erotic “alluring dance” committed to film.
With or without Harlow’s appeal as a sex symbol, Beast falters too much of the time, though it starts strong. As the film introduces us to its settings, it shows a cynical side that I find appealing.
However, after that it tends to meander. Beast largely wanders semi-aimlessly for its first 40 minutes or so, and this means the main plot doesn’t start to kick into gear until its second half.
If Beast created a vivid crime drama, I wouldn’t mind these sluggish moments as much. However, it continues to lack much urgency or real drama the rest of the way as well.
Granted, we get some lively moments along the way, mainly when they paint corruption and sleaze. Still, an awful lot of the film just lacks much bite.
We do get an 11-year-old Mickey Rooney in only his second feature film. Rooney debuted as a six-year-old and starred in a slew of “Mickey McGuire” shorts through the 1920s but he didn’t move to full-length flicks full-force until after Beast.
Beyond that trivia question, I don’t find a lot to like about Beast. While it shows sparks on occasion, too much of the movie struggles to find drama.