Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (April 14, 2026)
2020 brought Greenland, a tale of attempted survival in the face of an extinction level event. 2026 delivers Greenland 2: Migration, a follow-up that concentrates on the survivors’ next steps.
Five years earlier, a comet hit Earth and killed off much of the population. John Garrity (Gerard Butler), wife Allison (Morena Baccarin) and son Nathan (Roman Griffin Davis) managed to stay alive in a bunker in Greenland.
Because the planet remains unstable, this facility becomes uninhabitable. This sends the Garrity clan on a perilous journey to find a new home.
Originally intended for release in summer 2020, the original Greenland encountered multiple delays due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eventually the studio threw gave up on a US theatrical release and put it out streaming/on-demand at the end of the year.
I guess it did decent numbers in that realm, though apparently not so good that Migration landed on the fast track. Actually, the production company announced the sequel summer 2021 but some financial issues disrupted its path to a shoot.
Which explains the more than five-year gap between the release of the first movie in December 2020 and the second chapter’s arrival in January 2026. I wouldn’t expect a third film, though, because Migration didn’t even earn half its $90 million budget at the global box office.
The 2020 Greenland turned into a surprisingly effective disaster movie. While not a classic, it kept me involved and engaged.
With the same director, writer and lead actors, I hoped Migration would fare at least as well. Unfortunately, it becomes a more generic and less thrilling adventure.
Everything about Migration simply feels more anonymous than its predecessor did. Not that the 2020 film delivered a disaster flick that seemed especially creative or original, but it nonetheless managed to bring zing to the genre.
Via its theme, Migration can come across like a remake of the 2020 tale. In that one, the Garritys fled a catastrophe to find safety, and they do the same here, with plenty of risks and danger along the way.
Granted, the nature of the world the Garritys encounter differs from the prior flick to this one. Still, we get essentially the same concepts and concerns in both.
If director Ric Roman Waugh brought some spark to the proceedings, this wouldn’t matter. However, he makes it a paint-by-numbers affair.
Which doesn’t surprise me. Across his decades as a feature director, Waugh has proven to be persistently workmanlike and without cinematic inspiration.
Waugh produces fairly generic action flicks on fairly reasonable budgets. Though most don’t rake in much money at the box office, I suspect they do well enough via other outlets to ensure Waugh’s continued employment.
Migration provides another perfectly competent but unremarkable thriller. Honestly, it delivers what I expected from the 2020 Greenland, and that makes it a disappointment.
Again, I don’t want to bill the prior flick as some classic. Nonetheless, it did well for itself, especially given Waugh’s limited filmmaking talent.
Migration turns into the more generic affair I expected back in 2020. It throws enough danger and drama at the viewer to ensure involvement, and it also benefits from a shorter running time than its predecessor.
Indeed, that movie’s 120-minute running time felt like its biggest weakness, as I thought it would’ve fared better at more like 105 minutes. At least the 98-minute Migration fixes that “mistake”.
Nonetheless, I’ll take the surprisingly effective disaster tale of the 120-minute Greenland over the spotty thrills of the 98-minute Migration. While I can find many worse action dramas, the sequel just seems flat and mediocre.