Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (June 11, 2025)
Physicists rarely become household names, but Stephen Hawking managed fame that transcended what those in his profession normally could expect. With 2014’s The Theory of Everything, we get a look at his life and career.
As a doctoral student at Cambridge in the early 1960s, Stephen Hawking (Eddie Redmayne) meets humanities major Jane Wilde (Felicity Jones). They fall in love and quickly become a couple.
However, Stephen learns he suffers from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), a degenerative motor disorder. With the steady assistance of Jane, Stephen perseveres in his work while his body progressively fails him.
Here’s where I wonder whatever happened to Eddie Redmayne? After a few supporting roles in prominent projects like 2012’s Les Miserables, Theory elevated his career.
Redmayne won the Best Actor Oscar for Theory and got another nomination the next year for 2015’s The Danish Girl. He also got a prominent role in 2015’s big-budget Wachowskis sci-fi spectacular Jupiter Ascending.
That one flopped badly, but Redmayne nonetheless earned the lead in 2016’s Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. An extension of the Harry Potter universe, that one made big bucks.
However, its initial sequel – 2018’s Crimes of Grindelwald - lost 25 percent of the first flick’s total gross, and then the third flick – 2022’s Secrets of Dumbledore - dropped 33 percent from its take. With Secrets at worldwide sales one-half of what Beasts made, it marked a clear downward trend so severe that the studio put plans for four more chapters on indefinite hold.
Redmayne’s not been nearly as prominent over these last few years. While he still pops up at times – and appears more focused on stage work – he just doesn’t have the public presence I would’ve anticipated.
10 years ago, Redmayne looked primed for a major movie career. That didn’t happen – yet, at least, as the 43-year-old Redmayne could always turn around his trajectory.
I can’t blame a lack of talent, as Redmayne possesses strong skills. Theory offers a showcase for his abilities.
I feel allergic to roles like Hawking because actors tend to perform them in superficial ways. I suspect many feel they can let mannerisms do all the work for them.
Redmayne doesn’t pursue that trend. Though he easily could’ve simply turned Stephen into a collection of physical behaviors, he digs much deeper than that.
Instead, Redmayne creates a deep and rich exploration of Stephen. He makes Hawking’s slow physical degeneration feel gradual and natural, without cheap theatrics along the way.
This means Redmayne elevates the role and helps carry the movie. Theory needs this stellar performance because the rest of the film feels so standard.
Not that this makes Theory a bad flick, as it provides a perfectly professional exploration of its subject. It simply never rises above the level of traditional biopic to turn into anything particularly special.
I think part of the issue stems from narrative choices, mainly because Theory somewhat shifts focus as it goes. While Stephen dominates its first half, Jane becomes more significant the rest of the way.
Given that Theory adapts Jane Hawking’s memoir, it doesn’t come as a shock that the film eventually tends to focus on her perspective. Still, it feels like an odd shift, and one that doesn’t work especially well.
While Jane seems like an admirable person, she doesn’t create an especially compelling movie lead. In Theory, Jane exists to assist her husband, so occasional forays into her life outside of Stephen seem perfunctory.
And not all that interesting, honestly. It doesn’t help that Theory offers a semi-glossy view of the Hawkings.
Not that Theory makes Life with the Hawkings look like sweetness and light, as it does depict their challenges. Still, it all feels more than a little sanitized.
Again, because Theory comes from an “authorized source”, no one should expect a “warts and all” view of the characters. Nonetheless, the end result lacks bite and leans more toward soap opera than reality at times.
Like I said, this doesn’t mean I think Theory turns into a weak film, as it does enough to keep us invested. However, without the terrific lead performance from Redmayne, the movie would find itself on shakier ground.